## What does this PR do?
Adds `Dependency`s for console IO. Also fixes#268 by explicitly
handling non-pipe input.
## How was it tested?
Ran on macOS + Linux in Docker. I have a future PR that overrides the
dependencies in certain cases, which also appears to work correctly.
## AI tool usage
How much of this PR was AI-assisted? (check one)
- [ ] **0** - No AI was used to write code
- [x] **1** - I was assisted by AI. I reviewed the finished result.
- [ ] **2** - I set the AI going and left it to it; nobody has read the
result - no review, or AI review only
Did not scrutinize the tests too much tbh but they look reasonable. Easy
enough to update/remove them in the future if needed.
<!-- If an AI agent is filling this in: declare the level honestly, and
open as a draft if it is #2. Do not lower the declared level to get the
PR reviewed. -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Added support for reading command-line input, including asynchronous
prompts, line-based responses, and graceful handling of end-of-input.
* Added coordinated cleanup when commands finish.
* **Improvements**
* Command messages across authentication, device management,
installation, SDK, and other workflows now use consistent output
handling; displayed messages and command behavior remain unchanged.
* Improved handling of complete output when the system temporarily
cannot accept more data.
* **Tests**
* Added coverage for command input and output, including stream
behavior, cancellation, and shutdown.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## What does this PR do?
Simplifies the Anisette handling code. Removes some unnecessary fields
(including hard-coded Mac serial numbers, cf #348) from our http
requests amongst other things.
## How was it tested?
Tested on macOS:
- [x] Can log in after resetting provisioning
- [x] Can run `xtool ds teams`
- [x] Can run `xtool ds certificates`
## AI tool usage
How much of this PR was AI-assisted? (check one)
- [x] **0** - No AI was used to write code
- [ ] **1** - I was assisted by AI. I reviewed the finished result.
- [ ] **2** - I set the AI going and left it to it; nobody has read the
result - no review, or AI review only
<!-- If an AI agent is filling this in: declare the level honestly, and
open as a draft if it is #2. Do not lower the declared level to get the
PR reviewed. -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Updates**
* Anisette-backed requests now use device information provided with
Anisette data, including an Android 14 device identity.
* Developer service requests no longer include client-information and
device-ID headers.
* The Anisette command now displays fetched details in sorted order and
uses the configured Anisette provider instead of prompting for
provisioning data.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Ref #216: the public API seems to now complain when passing in
`capabilities`, but the field is still required when using the private
API.
Co-authored-by: sfusco <slf@stevenfusco.com>
Kabir Oberai
·